H.G. Wells, Biotechnology, and Genetic Engineering: A Dystopic Vision
By
Steven Best and Douglas Kellner
Curriculum Vitae: http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/DK97CV.htm
Best homepage: http://www.utep.edu/philos/best.htm
"Sometimes I call this reality
Science, sometimes I call it Truth. But it is something we draw by pain and
effort out of the heart of life, that we disentangle and make clear. Other men
serve it, I know, in art, in literature, in social invention, and see it in a
thousand different figures, under a hundred names... I do not know what it is,
this something, except that it is supreme." H.G. Wells
The writings of
H.G. Wells offer a highly dialectical vision of science and technology as
providing both tremendous benefits and dangers for human beings.[1]
A prolific writer of novels, short stories, and works of non-fiction, Wells
praised the wonders of science and technology, mostly in his non-fiction (1902
and 1938). Yet he also sketched out potential horrors in his science-fiction
writings, which stand as great achievements in the history of dystopic
literature that provide cautionary warnings about science and technology out of
control (1996a, 1996b, and 1996c). While Wells frequently championed science
and technology as great vehicles of progress, he also provided prescient
warnings of their misuse and abuse. In particular, he anticipated that science
and technology could create mutations in the human and generate new species.
Moreover, in Wellsı dystopic vision, human beings were potentially a transitory
phenomenon that could vanish like dinosaurs or Neanderthals.
Wells thus
possessed wide-ranging philosophical and historical vision, imagining that the
coevolution of science, technology, and human beings could alter the forms of
space and time, the patterns of human life, and produce both marvels and
monsters. A believer in evolution, he imagined that the human species could
mutate in surprising and discontinuous ways, anticipating positive leaps and
negative regressions in the human adventure. Evolutionary perspectives are thus
a major theme in Wells' work which carried speculation on the fate of humanity
into the realm of what we are calling the "fifth discontinuity."
H.G.
Wells and the Fifth Discontinuity
³Man, unless the order of the universe has come to and end, will undergo further modification and at last cease to be man, giving rise to some other type of animated being.² H.G. Wells
Bruce Mazlish
(1993) postulated that the construction and reconstruction of human identities
in the modern era involves the dramas and conflicts of crossing four
"discontinuities." Beginning with Copernicus, human beings had to
bridge the gulf between the earth and the universe to accept the fact that the
sun, not the earth, is the center of our solar system. Darwin compelled
humanity to examine its evolutionary past and rethink the alleged great divide
between itself and animals. Freud showed that reason is not even master of its
own domain, its operations being determined by the will, instincts, affects,
unconscious, and life-history. And as technology advances to the point of
creating human-like computers and robots, and we become ever more like cyborgs,
humanity is forced to question its self-proclaimed ontological divide from
machines.
Since the opening
of modernity, then, human beings have had to confront four major discontinuities
which they created in order to establish their alleged radical uniqueness and
special status. In each case, "rational man" had to rethink its
identity to overcome false dichotomies and illusions of separation from the
cosmos, the animal world, the unconscious, and the machines it invented. Yet,
against what Mazlish suggests, the process of identity construction prompted by
science and technological innovations is not over: we envision yet another
yawning gulf -- a fifth discontinuity -- that poses still more
challenges to human identity and, perhaps, to our very survival.
The notion of the
"fourth discontinuity" developed by Mazlish (1993) involved the
perception that humans are not qualitatively different from machines and are
imploding into machines. The fifth discontinuity, however, envisages
that humans are creating, or that there could exist, a superior species
and that humans no longer would be the sovereign power of nature. Such a
condition would emerge if humans become subordinate to machines and the
technological results of their labor. This discontinuity would suggest that the
human race may degenerate or disappear as an offspring of evolution, or that a
more intelligent and powerful alien species may appear to enslave or destroy
humans. All of these possibilities were foreseen by Wells who emerges in our
analysis as the prophet of the fifth discontinuity.
While Mary
Shelley's Frankenstein can be read as an early modern response to the
dangers that science and technology could go out of control and produce
monstrosities (see Best and Kellner 2001), Wells is thoroughly modern, residing
in the world of automobiles, radio, airplanes, X-rays, movies, and wonder
drugs. In some ways, Wells was a modernizer, reacting against the conservatism
of the Victorian age and he saw science and technology as progressive forces.
In an amazing anticipation of the Internet, Wells imagined a World Brain or
World Encyclopedia that would contain all existing knowledge:
an immense and ever-increasing wealth
of knowledge is scattered about the world today, a wealth of knowledge and
suggestion that -- systematically ordered and generally disseminated-- would
probably... suffice to solve all the mighty difficulties of our age, but that
knowledge is still dispersed, unorganised, impotent (1938: 47).
To remedy the
situation, Wells proposed that all knowledge in the world be gathered in the
World Brain, "a new world organ for the collection, indexing, summarising
and release of knowledge." This project would entail "the creation of
an efficient index to all human knowledge, ideas and achievements... the
creation, that is, of a complete planetary memory for all mankind."
Projecting a technopopulism, Wells insists: "the whole human memory can
be, and probably at a short time will be, made accessible to every
individual... the time is ripe for a very extensive revision and modernisation
of the intellectual organization of the world... this synthesis of knowledge is
the necessary beginning to the new world. [The world] has to pull its mind
together," through this new kind of "mental clearing house, the World
Brain" (1938: 59, 60, 61, 26, 64, and 49).[2]
While Wells could
thus perceive science and technology as progressive forces, he was also aware
of the dangers of scientific experiment and technological development devoid of
ethical vision and concern. In particular, Wells' short stories and novels
exhibit his subtle and dialectical conceptions of science and technology. In
his most popular and inventive stories (1996c), a similar formula is at work:
his characters encounter a marvelous scientific or technological breakthrough
or anomaly that could produce positive and wondrous results or could generate a
disaster. Usually, the outcome is ambiguous in Wellsı stories which forces us
to contemplate the dialectical ambiguities of science and technology which
sometimes create very positive results, sometimes negative, and sometimes
mixed.
Wellsı vision of
science and technology thus captures their contradictions and tensions, which
can yield both gains and losses. For example, in "The Stolen
Bacillus" (1894) a scientist works on discovery of a cure to cholera, but
the theft of his bacillus by a deranged anarchist could threaten the lives of
the city, showing science capable of producing both cures to disease and new
agents of destruction (1996c: 26-33). Likewise, in "The New
Accelerator," it is not clear at first that the wonder drug which
accelerates the characters' sense of time will be a blessing or a curse, though
by the end of the story it appears to be catastrophic (1996c: 362-377).
Science fiction
traditionally has articulated both utopian yearnings that science and
technology would take us beyond earthly limitations into exciting new cultures
and worlds, and worries that these forces would create monstrous and
destructive artifacts and effects. Hence, the best SF portrays the adventures
and grandeur of science and technology, as well as warning of its perils and
dangers. Furthermore, it is SF, we suggest, that maps the magnitude of the
changes that scientific and technological revolutions are currently generating
-- although we are arguing that both SF and critical social theory are
necessary to illuminate the depth and magnitude of the turbulent
transformations of the postmodern adventure (Best and Kellner, 2001).
Wells delivered what Isaac Asimov (1979) called "The Science-Fiction Breakthrough" by portraying the extreme discontinuities with the past that science and technology were producing. While Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is often taken to be the first SF text, it is more of an anticipation of the science fiction genre, mixing gothic horror and romance with a cautionary warning concerning the dangers of science and technology going out of control. And while Jules Verne shaped some of the conventions of the science fiction genre, his works can be seen as a continuation of the tradition of travel and adventure series where the protagonists undergo fabulous adventures -- a genre that can be traced back to Homer. Verne shared the Enlightenment belief that science and technology were vehicles of progress and his adventure/science fiction tales demonstrated what developments of technologies like submarines or rocket ships would look like and produce. He was optimistic, believing that science and technology would create a better life for all and higher stages of civilization, while Wells had a more pessimistic vision, believing that science and technology contained the seeds of catastrophe as well as progress.
Wells had studied science with Thomas Huxley and this research gave him a tragic vision of evolution as full of conflict and violence, mutations, and extinctions of species, and catastrophic breaks and ruptures in history, that could bring about historical regression.[3] Moreover, more so than Verne or previous science fiction writers, Wells conceived that science and technology could break the laws of space and time, create entire new species, and that alien species could arrive on earth with superior science, technology, and weapons which could subjugate or destroy humans. He thus anticipated what we call the ³fifth discontinuity,² a dramatic decentering of the human, as envisaged the end of human sovereignty over nature and other beings.
Wells pursued the "what if" logic of modern SF to new dimensions, conceiving radically other universes and beings, and anticipating developments in which humans are forced to discern that they are no longer the dominant species.[4] There are at least three domains of the fifth discontinuity, most of which Wells anticipated. First, there exists the possibility that machines might be created that are more intelligent than human beings (see Paul and Cox 1996; Moravac 1988; Kurzweil 1999). In one variant of this scenario, humans will assimilate technology that will dramatically increase their intelligence, longevity and powers, thus in effect creating a new superior posthuman species. In another scenario, humans will create machines, "mind children" (Morevac), or "spiritual machines" (Kurzweil), which will constitute an ascendent species of intelligent life. In these visions, human beings either merge with the computers and robots they are creating, or they become inferior and obsolete.
Secondly, humans
could create a new species through biotechnology and genetic engineering that
are more advanced than humans, as was anticipated in Victor Frankenstein's
creation of new life forms, and Wells' science fiction. Whereas the first
variant is rooted in conceptions of artificial intelligence, computer technology
and robotics, the second conception is grounded in biotechnology and genetic
engineering. Examples of suprahuman beings created through genetic engineering
range from Wellsı vision of new syntheses of animal and human life in The
Lost Island of Dr. Moreau to the creation of a monstrous superman as in The
Invisible Man to a race of giants in Food of the Gods. In these
cases, science and technology engineer human beings to create potentially new
superior beings that overpower and control humans.
Dystopic science
fiction and cinema, that follows Wellsı vision, provides cautionary warnings
that current technologies of genetic engineering and artificial intelligence
might produce entities that threaten human dominion and even survival. While a
new technospecies may someday come about through artificial intelligence and
biotechnology, and dozens of transgenic species in fact already exist, the
third type of fifth discontinuity is an entirely speculative possibility. This
form of radical decentering of human beings would emerge if aliens appeared
that are superior to human beings, a fear popular in SF literature and TV shows
of the past decade like The X-Files, Dark Skies, Prey, and
First Wave. According to the celebrated "Drake's equation"
which calculates the chances of alien life existing, the infinite time and
space of the universe provides good odds that extraterrestrial beings exist and
scientists like Carl Sagan have affirmed the possibility, although these
speculations have been disputed (see Best and Kellner, 2001, Epilogue).
In War of the
Worlds (1898), Wells imagined that superior alien races could travel to
earth and defeat and destroy humans, thereby decentering and dethroning
humanity as the highest form of evolution. In the first major tale of
interplanetary warfare, Wells instilled in the popular psyche a fear of aliens
that remains a major constant of a tradition of SF and media culture. A pointed
satire of imperialist invasion that elicited similarities to destructive forms
of colonization in modernity, Wells' story provided a cautionary warning that
imperialist forces themselves could be made subject to unknown and calamitous
counterforces. Similarly, in his story "Empire of the Ants," he
showed intelligent, giant killer ants naturally evolving in a Brazilian
rain-forest and threatening humanity with extinction, suggesting again that
humans could be displaced as masters of earth by other life forms (the 1977
disaster film Empire of the Ants, loosely based on Wells' story, by
contrast, portrayed the giant ants mutating from nuclear wastes, adding an
ecological theme).
In The Time
Machine (1895) and The Invisible Man (1897), Wells portrayed humans
mutating into new species and transcending the boundaries of space, time, and
the forms of human being. Wells was a believer in evolution and imagined that
the human species could unfold in surprising and discontinuous ways,
anticipating positive leaps and negative collapses in the adventure of
evolution. The Time Machine (1996b) portrayed humans as changing into
new species. Envisaging the coevolution of humans, science, technology, and
society, he foresaw the possibility of drastically different forms of human
life and society. Moreover, in a ruthlessly negative, nihilistic vision, Wells
depicts a terrifying future for humanity. The novel imagines an entropic
collapse not only of civilization, but the earth itself, devoured in the red
hot fireball of an exploding sun. In Well's dark vision, the Time Traveler
discovers that humanity is sharply divided between species/classes in the year
AD 802,701: the privileged Eloi who live above ground, and the super-exploited,
subterranean Morlocks. The story allegorizes growing class divisions in society
and how extreme differences between the classes could create different species
and forms of (post)human being.
The Time
Machine also articulates a critique of the Enlightenment notion of
progress. Wells' Time Traveler "thought but cheerlessly of the Advancement
of Mankind and saw the growing pile of civilization only a foolish heaping that
must inevitably fall back upon and destroy its maker in the end" (1996c:
77-78). Time travel in Wells' allegory is itself a metaphor for vision into the
future of evolution and a warning that human species could fall prey to
catastrophe rather than build ever new and better engines of progress. In his
division of humanity into two transhuman species, the Eloi and the Morlocks,
who are descendants of contemporary humanity, Wells warns that an irrational
organization of society can produce monstrous results. The Eloi are
hyperrefined and decadent, while the Morlocks are crude and degenerate,
providing a parable of the deleterious effects of class division in which one
group is condemned to constant labor while the other group suffers the effects
of excessive leisure. The brutalization of the Morlochs allegorizes the outcome
of a life of alienated labor, while the Eloi represent the results of
excessively passive consumption and leisure. There is thus a Marxist subtext to
the story: unless exploitation stops and the division of a class society is
overcome, the human species faces disastrous dichotomization, discord, and
decline.
The Invisible
Man (1996b) presents human beings shattering the limits of scientific
possibility and creating a new type of freakish being. An alien among his own
kind, Dr. Griffin is a Faust-like scientist whose "strange and evil
experiment" (1996b: 153) succeeds on a technical level, rendering him
invisible. But the discovery dooms him in the social context he cannot escape.
Ruthlessly selfish, "powerful, angry, and malignant" (1996b: 137),
driven toward immoral acts and insane visions, Griffin symbolizes all that can
go wrong with science, as the communities he terrorizes unite against him. Griffin's
knowledge remains secret, but the slumbering power of science to create
miracles and/or monstrosities could be recovered and used at any time,
suggesting the need for citizens to be ever-vigilant about the development of
science and technology.
In two key novels, Wells anticipated
biotechnology as presciently as he later foresaw the Internet. In Food of
the Gods (1965
[1904]), Wells vividly portrays the possibly of destructive consequences of
genetically modified food and, more generally, a culture based on unrestrained
growth imperatives. The novel tells the tale of two scientists who with good
intentions create "boomer" food that promotes growth processes in
nature. To their horror, the technology runs amuck as everything from
vegetation and insects to rats and human babies consume the food and grow to
monstrous proportions. Wells not only offers a warning about tampering with
food and metabolic processes for allegedly benign purposes -- such as
genetically engineered "golden rice" touted today as the miracle
panacea for human hunger -- he also ridicules the myopia of scientists who live
in "monastic seclusion" from their social world and therefore easily
conjure up misguided and dangerous schemes. The novel dramatizes a severe
process of "genetic pollution" whereby the altered crops had migrated
beyond the "Experimental Farm" and entered the food chain in less
than a year before its first trials. Wells thereby anticipates a key problem
with genetic engineering today, namely, the lack of adequate testing procedures
and the rushing of genetically altered substances onto the market.
As if scripted by Wells'
dystopian vision, today genetic scientists working for corporations such as
"Metamorphix" have found a way to block the genes that limit an
animal's natural growth, and consequently have produced giant chickens, sheep,
pigs, fish, and other animals. Such violent disruptions of natural processes
led to numerous deformities (see below), and thus scientists -- a la Dr. Moreau
-- have conducted this research as far from the public eye as possible.[5]
In a way faithful to current procedures, Wells underscores "the general
laxity of method that prevailed at the Experimental Farm" (29). Moreover,
he prefigures "a public so glutted with novelty" (68) that it tends
to ignore the serious consequences of scientific and technological
developments. Capturing the conflicts of the present, Wells portrays both
technophilic groups adamantly in favor of the food and who believe that the
technology is controllable, and technophobic groups (societies for the
"Total Suppression of Boomfood" and the "Preservation of the
Proper Proportion of Things"). The latter are vehemently against
artificially-generated food and argue that the technology is uncontrollable.
Wells thus captures the strident debates that mark the contemporary controversy
over genetic engineering. While he observes the beauty and improved features of
the giant children, Wells largely portrays the new food technology as
"distorting the whole order of natural life ... it swept over boundaries
and turned the world of trade into a world of catastrophes" (134).
On this dystopian scenario,
insects will rise up against us, the plant world will strangle us, and fish in
the sea will destroy our ships. Soon, Wells imagines, only gigantism will
reign, and all things of small scale will perish - including humans! Much as
some today see genetic engineering as creating a new line of evolution within
the human species, Wells' scenario forecasts a world where the food creates a "new
race" such that a cleavage opens up between the little and gigantic
groups. Allegorizing emerging global economic conditions, the novel concludes
on a pessimistic note of a world given over to the imperatives of endless
growth and ceaseless conflict as humans attempt to adapt to the rapidly
changing conditions of technologies that control them -- rather than humans
becoming masters of their technologies.
"Strange as it may seem to the
unscientific reader, there can be no denying that ... the manufacture of
monsters -- and perhaps even of quasi-human monsters -- is well within
the possibilities of vivisection." H.G. Wells
The Island of
Dr. Moreau (1996a [1896]) projects a frightening vision of an emerging
condition in which human and animal life implode. In its multi-leveled
complexity, the novel is a powerful protest against the self-proclaimed right
of science to experiment on animals and to engineer new life forms. It provides
a profound meditation on the conflicts within human beings endowed with reason,
but unable to escape the violent legacy of their animal past. Forced to
relocate his barbaric animal experiments to a remote Pacific island when
exposed to the public by a journalist, Moreau undauntingly advances his project
to create new life forms.
Shortly after his
arrival to the island, the shipwrecked journalist Prendrick hears cries from
the "House of Pain," smells antiseptic, and witnesses the sundry
"Beast Folk" engineered by Moreau, a grotesque menagerie of
transgenic freaks that include mixtures of hyena and swine, ape and goat, bear
and bull, and horse and rhinoceros. Initially, Prendrick sees them as humans
devolved into animals, but Moreau informs him that in fact they are animals he
is trying to elevate into humans, changing not only their entire physical
reality but also their minds to prohibit any "regression" to animal
behavior. Encountering the shock of visions of "the strangest beings"
(125) he has ever seen, Prendrick discerns that the island "is full of
inimical phenomena" (157) and he condemns Moreau as a "lunatic"
and "ugly devil" (107). Prendrick comes to the conclusion that Dr.
Moreau, like Shelley's Dr.
Frankenstein, "was so irresponsible, so utterly careless. His curiosity,
his mad, aimless investigations, drove him on" (185).
Moreau, of
course, has a different image of himself. Although he has perfected the art of
scientific detachment, of separation of fact from value, indifferent to the
pain he inflicts on his victims, he imagines himself as a benefactor who is
trying to improve the evolution of species. For twenty years, he devoted
himself "to the study of the plasticity of living forms" (159).
Rejecting any belief that nature and species boundaries are fixed, he seeks to
"conquer" nature (167), to bend it to his will, to become God-like in
his power to design species, while admitting that he has "never troubled
himself about the ethics of the matter" (163).
In an uncanny
anticipation of xenotransplantation and genetic engineering, Wells, speaking
through Moreau, imagines that "it is a possible thing to transplant tissue
from one part of an animal to another or from one animal to another, to alter
its chemical reactions and methods of growth, to modify the articulation of its
limbs, and indeed to change it in its most intimate structure" (160). Yet,
every time Moreau's chimeras seem to verge toward "triumphs of
vivisection" (158), they revert to animality. Despite Moreau's
conditioning that he believes makes it impossible for the chimeras to disobey
his will, the hybrids regularly break his laws, and in time rebel and kill him
-- the Beast Folk rampage out of control. At the end of John Frankenheimer's
1996 film version of Wells' story, the empathetic Prendrick, upon leaving,
tells the subhumans he will bring back the best of Western science to help
them, but a transgenic victim of this very science implores: "No more
scientists, no more laboratories, no more research ... We have to be what we
are."
Like The
Invisible Man, The Island of Dr. Moreau crystallizes Well's
antipathy toward scientific arrogance and its lack of social conscience. As
Shelley and Wells anticipated, science and technology indeed can create
monstrosities. Perhaps the most stunning image in scientific history shows a
human ear grown on the back of a mouse, signaling the newly found powers of
genetic transposition.
The agricultural use of genetics and cloning has already produced horrible monstrosities. Transgenic animals often are born deformed and suffer from fatal bleeding disorders, arthritis, tumors, stomach ailments, kidney disease, diabetes, inability to nurse and reproduce, behavioral and metabolic disturbances, high mortality rates, and Large Offspring Syndrome. In order to genetically engineer animals for maximal weight and profit, a Maryland team of scientists created the infamous "Beltway pig" afflicted with arthritis, deformities, and respiratory disease. Cows engineered with bovine growth hormone (rBGH) have mastitis, hoof and leg maladies, reproductive problems, numerous abnormalities, and die prematurely. Giant supermice endure tumors, damage to internal organs, and shorter life spans. Numerous animals born from cloning are missing internal organs such as hearts and kidneys. A Maine lab specialized in breeding sick and abnormal mice who go by names such as Fathead, Fidget, Hairless, Dumpy, and Greasy. Similarly, experiments in the genetic engineering of salmon have led to rapid growth and various aberrations and deformities, with some growing up to 10 times their normal body weight (see Fox 1999). Cloned cows are ten times more likely to be unhealthy as their natural counterparts. Such are the aberrant results where technology flagrantly disrupts natural processes and life cycles.
It is worth emphasizing as well that
Dolly, the first cloned sheep, is inexplicably overweight and suffers from
premature arthritis, cloned mice have also become extremely obese, and cloned
cows have been born with abnormally large hearts and lungs. A report from
newscientists.com argues that genes are disrupted when cultured in a lab, and
this explains why so many cloned animals die or are grossly abnormal. On this
account, it is not the cloning or IVF process that is at cause, but the
culturing of the stem cells in the lab, creating major difficulties in cloning
since so far there is no way around cloning through cultured cells in
laboratory conditions.[6]
A team of U.S. scientists at the
M.I.T. Whitehead Institute examined 38 cloned mice and learned that even clones
which look healthy suffer genetic maladies and scientists found the mice cloned
from embryonic stem cells had abnormalities in the placenta, kidneys, heart,
and liver. They feared that the defective gene functioning in clones could,
wreak havoc with organs and trigger foul-ups in the brain later in life and
that embryonic stem cells are highly unstable.[7]
³There are almost no normal clones,² study author and MIT biology professor
Rudolf Jaenisch, explained. Jaenisch claims that only 1-5% of all cloned
animals survive, and even those that survive to birth often have severe
abnormalities and die prematurely.[8]
Gruesomely,
scientists have created headless embryos of mice and frogs, dispensing with
their superfluous heads so that they harvest only their organs -- a practice
one imagines could easily be used on human embryos grown as mere organ sacks
for genetic donors. In 1998, University of Minnesota scientist Jose Cibelli
announced that he had pursued a secret experiment where he cloned (and then
terminated) a human embryo by mixing his own DNA in the egg cell of a cow.
According to Jeremy Rifkin, "this is the most extraordinary single
development in the history of biotechnology because it now suggests that we can
create new human-animal species" in the manner of Dr. Moreau.[9]
Indeed, Rifkin and cohort Ted Howard have attempted to patent the first human
chimera engineered, in order to preempt ownership from any scientist or
corporation who might actually make one.
Their battle is
uphill, however, for a myriad of chimeras is beginning to sprout everywhere.
Following an earlier experiment at the University of Hawaii that mixed
jellyfish genes with the sperm of mice, for example, researchers at the
University of Oregon announced in December 1999 that they successfully inserted
jellyfish genes into monkey embryos to create a transgenic model to study human
fertility and diseases. Scientists transferred seven transgenic embryos into
the wombs of rhesus monkeys, leading to one successful birth named "George."
While the experiment may further scientific understanding, it may also pave the
way for designer babies and a eugenic society, as it furthers the knowledge of
how to add genes to human embryos to create desired life forms.[10]
Unlike the more conservatively constructed Dolly, the sheep "Polly"
is both cloned and genetically engineered, transformed to have a human gene in
her biological code in order to produce a human blood protein. Besides, sheep,
pigs, cattle, fish, and mice are some of the animals that now bear human genes,
as humans prepare for an onslaught of animal genes to enter their body.
Human history becomes more and more a race between
education and catastrophe. H.G. Wells
In the age of radical hybridization,
all genetic information is recodable and transposable, and thus we have
decisively passed into the realm of the Fifth Discontinuity. The boundaries
between natural/artificial and organic/technological are disappearing as all of
life - from bacteria and plants to animals and human beings -are being
reconstructed, patented, and commodified in a ³second Genesis.² Our new era,
with all its strange novelties, demands new visions and new maps to survey the
bizarre terrain of the Fifth Discontinuity. These must be not only empirical
and sociological mappings, but also fictional and literary representations to
startle the imagination into adequately grasping nova such as artificial
intelligence, genetic engineering, cloning, and xenotransplantation. Science
fiction works, in particular, can anticipate new modes of being and illuminate
the present through presenting ways of seeing that provide concrete embodiment
to the abstractions of science and theory. They can also present the practical
and human consequences of inventions, technologies, and scientific
breakthroughs.
As the
line between science and science fiction dissolves - both because science
fiction often correctly anticipated current science and science has become so
surreal in theory and practice - fictional mappings become ever more important
in helping to situate ourselves in relation to rapidly changing times. Both
wonders and horrors await us. Meanwhile, we have imaginative mappings such as
supplied by H.G. Wells to help guide us through the turbulence of change. At the
same time, Wellsı vision urges the importance of a vigilant and knowledgeable
public and the need for science to be governed by moral imperatives as we move
into a world dominated by technoscience and global capitalism. Our current era
could thus profit from a close re-reading of Wellsı work and a rethinking of
the issues which he engaged.
Asimov, Isaac (1979) ³The Science-Fiction
Breakthrough,² in H.G. Wells, Three Novels of the Future. Garden City,
N.Y.: Doubleday.
Best, Steven, and Kellner,
Douglas (2001) The Postmodern Adventure. London and New York: Rouledge
and Guilford Press.
Kurzweil,
Ray (1999) The Age of Spiritual
Machines. When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence. . Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Moravec, Hans (1988) Mind
Children. The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence. Cambridge, Mass.:
Harvard University Press.
Mackenzie, Norman and
Jeanne Mackenzie (1973) H.G. Wells. A Biography. New York: Simon and
Schuster.
Muddiman, Dave (1998)
"The Universal Library as Modern Utopia: The Information Society of H.G.
Wells," Library History,
Vol. 14: 85-101.
Paul,
Gregory S. and Cox, Earl D. (1996) Beyond Humanism: CyberEvolution and
Future Minds. Rockland, Mass.: Charles River Media Inc.
Robins, Kevin and Frank
Webster (1999) Times of the
Technoculture.
London and New York: Routledge.
Wells, H.G. (1902) Anticipations
of the Reaction of Mechanical and Scientific Progress. London:
____________ (1938) World
Brain. London: Metheun.
_______________
(1965) The Food of the Gods. New York: Airmont Publishing.
_______________
(1996a) The Invisible Man. New York: Oxford University Press.
_____________(1996b)
The Time Machine and The Island of Dr. Moreau. New York: Oxford
University Press.
___________ (1996c) The
Country of the Blind and Other
Stories. New
York: Oxford.
[1]
Our study of Wells is extracted and
expanded from our book
The Postmodern Adventure.
Science Technology, and Cultural Studies at the Third Millennium (Best and
Kellner 2001).
[2]. We learned of Wells' concept of
the "World Brain" through
Robins and Webster (1999: 126-127) who in turn cite Muddiman 1998. Robins and
Webster equate Wells' vision with Bentham's Panopticon and a "generalized
Taylorism," dismiss it as "a perverse utopian proposal," "a
utopia of technocratic planning, administration and management," which
would, among other things, lead to a colonization and depletion of the public
sphere (1999: 127). We see it, by contrast, as an incredible anticipation of
the potential of the World Wide Web to make accessible knowledge and
information to people throughout the earth, at their fingertips and for their
disposal. This could also reinvigorate a severely decaying public sphere
through providing information and new means of communication and public debate
(see Best and Kellner 2001, Chapter 5). Robins and Webster fail to discuss,
moreover, the tensions between Wells' more scientistic and technocratic
thinking in his nonfiction, the profound and prophetic critical interrogations
of science and technology, and their potentially catastrophic effects in his
fiction. Hence, for us, Wells emerges as both a prescient critic of the dangers
of science and technology and a prophet of the great transformation that, for
better and worse, they would generate.
[3] See the discussion of Wellsı science studies
and the influence of Thomas Huxley in Mackenzie and Mackenzie 1973.
[4]. There are, of course,
many other examples of SF writers describing new species, such as the
metamorphoses at the end of 2001, Arthur C. Clarke's Childhood's End,
Frank Herbert's Dune novels, Octavia Butler's "patternist" and
"xenogenesis" novels, and the works of Rudy Rucker and other
cyberpunk writers (see Best and Kellner 2001). Wells, however, is the first to
consistently project images of new superior species which displace the
centrality of human beings, thus introducing what we are calling a "fifth
discontinuity."
[6]See ³Clones contain hidden DNA damage,² www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns9999982; see also the study published in Science
(July 6, 2001) which discusses why so many clone pregnancies fail and why some
cloned animals suffer strange maladies in their hearts, joints, and immune
system.
[7] ³Clone Study Casts Doubt in Stem Cells: Variations in Mice Raise Human Research Issues,² www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A23967-2001Jul5?language=printer, July 6, 2001.
[8] See ³Scientists Warn of Dangers of Human
Cloning,² www.abcnews.com. See also the
commentaries in Gareth Cook, ³Scientists say cloning may lead to long-term
ills,² The Boston Globe, July 6, 2001; Steve Connor, ³Human cloning
will never be safe,² Independent, July 6, 2001; Carolyn Abraham, ³Clone
creatures carry genetic glitches,² July 6, 2001; Connor cites Dolly-cloner Ian
Wilmut who noted: ³It surely adds yet more evidence that there should be a
moratorium against copying people How can anybody take the risk of cloning a
baby when its outcome is so unpredictable?²
[9]See www.msnbc.com/news/214299.asp.
[10]. The troubling
implications of this scenario, of course, were a core preoccupation of Aldous
Huxley, who continued Wells' speculations on a genetically-engineered society
and creation of new species. Indeed, with only trivial qualifications, Huxley's
Brave New World of genetic engineering, cloning, addictive pleasure
drugs (soma), megaspectacles, and intense social engineering has arrived.
Huxley thought cloning and genetic engineering were centuries away from
realization, but in fact they began to unfold a mere two decades since his
writing of Brave New World (1931). Technocapitalism cannot yet, for
instance, biologically clone human beings, but it can clone them in a far more
effective way -- socially. Whereas biological clones would have a mind of their
own, since the social world and experiences that conditioned the
"original" could not be reproduced, cloning a person according to a
given ideological and functional model is far more controlling. That is why
Huxley's sequel work, Brave New World Revisited, focuses on various
modes of social conditioning and
mind control.