Trading Freedom, specifically Civil Liberties, for Perceived Security or Safety?

Dr. John V. Richardson Jr., UCLA Professor of Information Studies

Fall Term 2007

 

 

USA PATRIOT Act stands for

“United and Strengthening America by

Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism

(USA PATRIOT) Act of 2001“

(P.L. 107-56; 26 October 2001; 115 Stat. 272-402)

 

 

 

Latest Status

 

Question:  Is the name of this Act “ideologically charged”?  (NPR, 20 October 2003)

 

342 pages (only 130 in Statutes) of modifications to the United States Code, Titles 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures), Title 28 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure), and especially Title 50 (War and National Defense); divided into ten titles. See Title 2, “Enhanced Surveillance Procedures”

 

Section 215 is entitled “Access to Records and Other Items under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act” (see http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/useftp.cgi?IPaddress=162.140.64.21&filename=publ056.pdf&directory=/diskc/wais/data/107_cong_public_laws )

 

1. Executive Branch, Presidential authority via Executive Orders (e.g., EO 12333)

2. Department of Justice (Attorney General, John Ashcroft, may also ask Secretary of Defense, Donald H. Rumsfeld, for assistance)

3. Federal Bureau of Investigation (Robert S. Mueller III, Director or delegate)

4. Assistant Special Agent in Charge

5. Semi-annual account of “tangible items” to Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate

 

Tangible items in Section 215 include “Books, records, papers, documents, and other items….”  Records can include business records, library circulation records as well as public-access computers in public libraries (see Section 505 as well).

 

"Section 215 [of the USA PATRIOT Act] gave the FBI authority to obtain library and bookstore records and a wide range of other documents during investigations of international terrorism or secret intelligence activities."  Bob Egelko at Sfgate.com  The target does not have to be a suspected terrorist.  Re booksellers see “Tattered Cover Inc. v. City of Thornton” (Colorado No. 01SA205)

 

Indeed, within the year, such law enforcement “officials visited at least 545 (10.7%) libraries to ask for these records.  Of these, 178 libraries (3.5%) received visits from the FBI” according to Leigh Estabrook of the LRC at the University of Illinois.  Before the House Judiciary on 20 May 2003, the Justice Department only admits to the FBI visiting “about 50 libraries…” see http://slate.msn.com/id/2087984/#ContinueArticle.

 

 

See DOJ gloss at http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/mie/ctu/section_215.pdf )

 

"Unlike other search warrants, the FBI need not show that evidence of wrongdoing is likely to be found or that the target of its investigation is actually involved in terrorism or spying. Targets can include U.S. citizens," according to Bob Egelko at Sfgate.com   No probable cause is needed; no notice necessary; no criminal subpoena; and without a warrant.

 

"Nearly everything about the procedure is secret. The court that authorizes the searches meets in secret; the search warrants carried by the agents cannot mention the underlying investigation; and librarians and booksellers are prohibited, under threat of prosecution, from revealing an FBI visit to anyone, including the patron whose records were seized," according to Bob Egelko at Sfgate.com

 

General Accounting (now Accountability) Office says that FOI Act impact of USA PATRIOT ACT: a) requires agencies to consider national security specifically.  Thirty one percent of federal agencies report changes—less FOIA information is being released.

 

On 6 March 2003, Representative Bernard Sanders (I-Vt.) introduced “Freedom to Read Protection Act” (H.R. 1157, 108th Congress, 1st Session) legislation with 24 co-sponsors (150 to date); bill refereed to Committee on Judiciary and Select Committee on Intelligence.  On July 2003 in the US District Court of Detroit, the ACLU filed the first legal challenge of Section 215 based on violations of the 4th Amendment, right to privacy, due process, and free speech on behalf of six Arab and Muslim-American community groups.  On July 31, Senator Russ Feingold (D-Wis.)—the only Senator to vote against the PATRIOT ACT—introduced his bill, “Libraries, Bookseller, and Personal Records Privacy Act,” with eight co-sponsors.  Hoping to amend Section 213, which allows “sneak and peak” searches of private citizens’ homes and offices without telling them until much later, Feingold also offered his “Liberty and Personal Privacy Act.” On 18 September, Attorney General Ashcroft stated Section 215 has never been invoked since passage. 

 

"National Security Letters" (aka NSLs)

 

According to the SelfStorage site, "A NSL functions like a subpoena but it is issued by an FBI agent, subject to Department of Justice guidelines, without the review of a judge or magistrate. The NSL also prohibits the recipient from disclosing to any person that the FBI has sought or obtained access to information or records. Thus, a business is served with a secret subpoena issued solely on the authority of the FBI and is obligated to maintain the secrecy of any action taken by the FBI." Apparently, the FBI has used it dozens of times and at least once "to demand internal records from a library association in Connecticut." (NYT 7 November 2005, A16) because Geoprge Christian, a local librarian who worked for Library Connection Inc., had refused to comply with turning over patron library records for three dozen libraries' email, circulation records, and websites visited. In September 2004, Judge Victor Marrero of the Southern District of New York issued a landmark decision striking down the NSL statute and the associated gag provision.

 

For more information, see ACLU's site "Safe and Free" at http://www.aclu.org/SafeandFree/SafeandFree.cfm?ID=15543&c=262

 

PATRIOT ACT II (2003)

In January 2003, "The Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003" (aka the PATRIOT ACT II) was introduced and then in June, reintroduced as "Vital Interdiction of Criminal Terrorist Organizations Act of 2003, or Victory Act."

 

Related Issues:

According to the INS in February 2003, there were about seven million illegal immigrants in the United States, but other estimates range from 8-9 million according to the US Census Bureau to as high as twenty million illegal immigrants according to David Cole at Georgetown University’s Law Center.  Under the PATRIOT ACT, an estimated 5,000 Arab American and Muslims are being secretly detained (with only five charged and one convicted). 

 

Questions: Does the Bill of Rights apply to American citizens only or foreign nationals as well?  “Persons” in the United States?  Does this law create a double standard?  When do they come for you?  Alternatively, are you willing to fund the US government quietly when it has to pay for reparations, if it all just turns out to be an honest “mistake”?

 

 

REFERENCE

 

 

Herbert N. Foerstel, Refuge of a Scoundrel: The PATRIOT Act in Libraries. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2004.

 

"As nightfall does not come all at once, neither does oppression.  In both instances, there is a twilight when everything remains seemingly unchanged.  And it is in such twilight that we all must be most aware of change in the air—however slight—lest we become unwitting victims of the darkness.”

--William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice

 

“Those who would give up essential liberties for a measure of security,

deserve neither liberty nor security."

-- Benjamin Franklin, U.S. Patriot
 

Last Revised: 8 February 2006--R;tw