Library and Information Science’s Role in Cultural Diplomacy:
Democracy, Propaganda or
Partnerships Abroad?
by
Dr. John V. Richardson Jr.
UCLA
Professor of Information Studies
1.
Propaganda (1718): "the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for
the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person"
according to the online version of Merriam-Webster’s
Collegiate Dictionary (accessed 29 October 2007)
2.
Diplomacy (1796): “1: the art and practice of conducting negotiations between nations;2 : skill in
handling affairs without arousing hostility,” according to the online version
of Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary
(accessed 21 February 2006) and as opposed to the historical practice of
“personal diplomacy” or “the new diplomacy” of the 1920s and 1930s or more
recently “conference diplomacy.”
3.
Cultural Diplomacy (1934): “1: The British Council
created as an arm of British cultural diplomacy and a focus for teaching
English as a foreign language….” according to the OED; 2: “Under the
Vienna Convention, the functions of a diplomatic mission include (1)
representation of the sending state in the host state, which extends beyond the
social and ceremonial, for an envoy is a substitute for his state in that
country, (2) protection within the host state of the interests of the sending
state and its nationals, including their property and shares in firms, (3)
negotiation on behalf of his state with the host state and signing the resultant
agreements when authorized, (4) reporting and gathering information by all
lawful means on conditions and developments in the host country for his
government, and (5) promotion of friendly relations between the two states and
furthering their economic, cultural, and
scientific relations, which includes commercial diplomacy….,” according to
“Modern Diplomacy Practice” in the Encyclopedia Britannica
(accessed 21 February 2006).
4.
Public
Diplomacy
(1965): “Public diplomacy . . . deals with the influence of public
attitudes on the formation and execution of foreign policies. It encompasses
dimensions of international relations beyond traditional diplomacy; the
cultivation by governments of public opinion in other countries; the
interaction of private groups and interests in one country with those of
another; the reporting of foreign affairs and its impact on policy;
communication between those whose job is communication, as between diplomats
and foreign correspondents; and the processes of inter-cultural communications.
..Central to public diplomacy is the transnational flow of information and
ideas." As used in an early
brochure of the Edward R. Murrow Center for Public Diplomacy at the Fletcher
School of Law and Diplomacy at
“Globalization
moves societies into liberal capitalism.” (Henri Dou & Sri Damayanty Manullang, 2004)
“Internationalization
of higher education is both a reaction to, but also, an agent of globalization.”
(Abdullahi, Kajberg, Virkus, 2007)
Harvey B. Feigenbaum, Globalization and Cultural Diplomacy. Issue Paper on Art, Culture & the
National Agenda. Washington, DC: Center
for Arts and Culture, George Washington University, 2001.
Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash
of Civilizations: Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996,
especially “Preface.”
Henry Kissinger, Does America
Need a Foreign Policy? Toward a Diplomacy
for the 21st Century. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2001,
especially chapter 7 “Peace and Justice.”
Henry E. Mattox, The Twilight of Amateur Diplomacy: The
American Foreign Service and Its Senior Officers in the 1890s. Kent, Ohio:
Kent State University Press, 1989.
Geoffrey C. Middlebrook, “The Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs and American Public Diplomacy during the Reagan Years: Purpose, Policy,
Program, and Performance,” PhD Dissertation, University of Hawaii, 1985.
“A recurrent tension in American public diplomacy as conducted by
the United States Information Agency (USIA) is the proper relationship between
the Agency's "twin pillars": informational programs and educational
and cultural programs. The dispute involves issues of incompatibility, as these
two sets of activities differ in modality and purpose. Because of these
disagreements, institutional structures and organizational patterns have been a
constant struggle in American public diplomacy. Concern over the integrity of
USIA's Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs was heightened with the
election of Ronald Reagan to the presidency. Observers initially concluded that
the Agency was unduly emphasizing
information at the expense of culture and education, and at the same time
inappropriately politicizing the latter programs. Congress moved to protect the
Bureau, and the result was that it experienced what appeared to be a period of
unprecedented enrichment. Nonetheless, there continued to be talk of separating
the Bureau from the Agency.
This
dissertation examines, describes, and evaluates the purposes, policies,
programs, and performance of the United States Information Agency's Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs during the years 1981 to 1989. More precisely,
it seeks to answer three basic research questions: To what extent and in what
ways was the Bureau enhanced and/or diminished during the period? What were the
essential dynamics at work in this strengthening and/or weakening of the
Bureau? What implications do these changes have regarding the optimum
institutional location for the Bureau? Based on the evidence, the research
conducted herein indicates that: in general the Bureau was enhanced in the
areas of budgets, activities, and stature; these changes were the result of a
productive conflict that occurred between the executive and legislative
branches, at the center of which was the Agency Director, as they negotiated
the definition and direction of the Bureau; USIA is presently and for the
foreseeable future the best organizational home for the Bureau.” (Emphasis added; Author Abstract)
Frank A. Ninkovich, U.S. Information Policy and
Cultural Diplomacy (No. 308). Series editor, Nancy L. Hoepli-Phalon. New York: Foreign Policy Association, 1996.
Frank A. Ninkovich, The Diplomacy
of Ideas: U.S. Foreign Policy and Cultural Relations, 1938-1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
1. Rugen, "Overseas Information Libraries of the US
Government," MSLS Thesis, Western Reserve University, 1950; “they do not
want propaganda”
2. Babin, "Book Selection Policy of
the US Information Libraries," MSLS Thesis, Catholic University, 1951
B.OWI disestablished by Turman (disestablished1946)
1. Office of International Information and Cultural Affairs (OIC)
renamed Office of International Information and Educational Exchange (1947)
C.
US Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 (aka Smith-Mundt Act or PL 80-402)
D.
United States Information Service (established 1953)
1. Foreign policy (Clemens, "The Pivot: The USUS Libraries in
Germany and the US Department of State," MLS Specialization Paper, UCLA,
1982)
2. Collection development (Wenning,
"Books Removed from the USIS Libraries," MA Thesis, Florida State
University, 1956)
i. 82
books removed;
ii. 20
titles by 8 authors said to be “Avowed Communists;” and
iii. 55
titles by 20 authors who refused to testify before Permanent Subcommittee on
Investigations
E.
United States Information Agency (established “to expose the ‘untruths’ of
communism,” 1957)
1. John F. Kennedy, defined the role of USIA to promote
“democracy”
2. Edward R. Morrow, appointed Director (1961)
F.
USIA Advisory Commission (William F. Buckley; “On the Right” and “Firing Line”)
G. International Communication Agency (too easily confused with CIA)
under President Jimmy Carter
H.
Merged into the United States Department of State (Fall 1999) due to Jesse
Helms and Madeleine Albright agreement
Gary E. Kraske, Missionaries of
the Book: The American Library Profession
and the Origins of United States Cultural
Diplomacy. Westport, CT:
Greenwood Press, 1985.
Having visited American Centers and American Corners in Eritrea
(Asmara and Keren), Russia (Moscow, St.
Petersburg, Vladivostok, and Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk), Uganda, and Zambia, it was
clear to me in 2002 that the Department of State needed to consider an “opening
day” collection of core reference materials consisting of books, journals, and
magazines which would support American studies in these countries. They have
since done so.
Updated: 3 February 2012
R;tw