http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1436
A. The Big Idea and the Search for “Knowledge:”
Certainty and Uncertainty
C. Grant
Proposal Writing and Inquiry Methodology (“Grant Getting”)
D. Responsible
Conduct of Research (1995) and Commission on
Research Integrity (1995)
1. UCLA’s IRB
and Certification
in the Protection of Human Subjects
2. ALA
Professional Ethics (2008)
3. ASA’s Code
of Conduct (Privacy,
Confidentiality, and Data Security)
4. Academic dishonesty--(APA Statement on Authorship
credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations, fabrication,
financial disclosure, misconduct, misrepresentation, and AHA’s 9-point Statement
on Standards of Professional Conduct) and Conflicts of Interest
D. Call for Papers; Conference Presentation and
Proceedings (Preprints)
E. The Scholarly
or Research Journal Article (“Getting into Print”)
1. Submission Process:
a) Audience Selection
b) Manuscript Characteristics including
Readability
c) Issues of House Style and
d) Multiple Submissions
2. Reviewing Process: Confidentiality; Single
versus Double
Blind Peer Reviewing
F. Key Concepts: Problems versus Topics;
Ethical Conduct, RCR, Single versus Double Blind Reviewing, Refereed versus
Invited Papers
1.
Waples, Douglas. Investigating Library Problems
(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1939).
2.
Borgman, Christine L. Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the
Internet (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007).
4.
Rebekah Nathan, "Afterword:
Ethics and Ethnography," In My Freshman Year: What a Professor
Learned By Becoming A Student (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005).
5.
Richardson, John V., Jr. and Charles E. Meier, “Scholarly
Journal Decision Making: A Graphic Representation,” Library
Quarterly 68 (1998): v -viii. (Illustration)
6.
Richardson, John V., Jr. The Spirit of Inquiry: The GLS at Chicago, 1921-1951 (Chicago: ALA,
1982), p. 121-29.