Attrition/Completion
Rates of Graduate Students
Updated: 10 November 2010
Given the concern about increasing time to degree as well as non-completion rates,
it might be useful to reflect on the affective, behavior, and cognitive components of
attribution or completion rates among graduate students.
Here's what an analytical review of the literature suggests:
DV = Attrition/Completion
IV1 = affective
variables:
Concepts |
Operationalized as: (Source) |
|
|
Ambiguity, Tolerance of |
(Bowen & Rudenstine,
1992) |
Attitude, Personal |
(Green, 1997) |
Caring Adviser |
(Ferrer de Valero, 2001) |
Commitment to Program |
(Bowen & Rudenstine,
1992) |
Community, Sense of |
(Lovitts, 2001) |
Connection to Adviser,
Sense of |
(Lovitts, 2001) |
Idealism |
(Lovitts, 2001) |
Inadequacy/Insecurity,
Feelings of |
(Baird, 1993; Lovitts,
2001) |
|
(Kluever, 1997) |
Initiative/Drive |
|
Interest/Desire |
(Lovitts, 2001) |
Isolation/Integration,
Sense of |
Individualized instruction
or non-cohort programs (Baird, 1991, 1997; Solórzano, 1993; Lovitts, 2001) |
Motivation, Strength of |
|
Perfectionism |
(Green, 1997) |
Perseverance |
(Bowen & Rudenstine,
1992) |
Personality (Style) |
MBTI (in general, Green,
1997) |
Persistence |
(Ferrer de Valero, 2001) |
Procrastination |
(Green, 1997) |
Responsibility, Personal |
(Kluever, 1997) |
Role Conflict |
(Anderson & Swazey,
1998) |
Satisfaction (with
interactions) |
(Lovitts, 2001) |
Stress, Feelings of |
(Goplerud, 1980) |
IV2 = behavioral
variables:
Concepts |
Operationalized as: (Source) |
|
|
Academic Preparation |
GPA (Lovitts, 2001) |
Adviser, Selection Process |
Presence/Absence; Assigned/Selected;
Early/Late (Lovitts, 2001) |
Adviser, Friendly and
Respectful |
( |
Acceptance of Faculty Direction |
(Baird, 1993) |
Demanding Program |
(Tinto, 1993) |
Finances/Financial aid |
Loans (Nerad & Cerny,
1993); Dollars Received: Assistantship or Fellowship (Smallwood, 2004) |
Focus |
Presence/Absence (Baird,
1993) |
Handbook |
Presence or Absence |
Intelligence |
(Baird, 1991, 1993) |
Interactions, Social (with
adviser, peers, and family) |
Quantity and Quality;
Collabor-ativeness (Baird, 1993; Nerad & Cerny, 1993; Tinto, 1993; Golde,
2000; Lovitts, 2001) |
Orientation |
Attendance or not |
Reception |
|
Research productivity |
Number of articles, etc. |
Workshops |
Attendance or not |
IV3 = cognitive variables:
Concepts |
Operationalized
as: (Source) |
|
|
Departmental
Culture |
Pressure
& expectation (Baird, 1991); environment (Nerad & Cerny, 1993) |
Disciplinary
Culture |
(Bowen
& Rudenstine, 1992) |
Expectations,
Knowledge of |
(Bowen
& Rudenstine, 1992) |
Fit,
Adviser-Advisee |
Research
expertise and interest (Golde & Dore, 2001; Lovitts, 2001) |
Socialization |
Mentoring,
Journals subscribed (Lovitts, 2001) |
Value
Systems |
(Bowen
& Rudenstine, 1992) |
PLUS
INSTITITIONAL VARIABLES: Accountability (i.e., recruitment allocation correlating
with retention rates, mentoring programs attended (Nyquist, 2002); facilities
(Nerad & Cerny, 1993); salary, promotion and tenure decisions (Bowen &
Rudenstine, 1992; Lipschutz, 1993).
SOURCES: The ABC Model was originally inspired by sessions
held during the Council of Graduate School’s Annual Meeting,
For
the many additional concepts and all of the sources, see chapter 2, “Literature
and Theory,” in Ellen Bara Stolzenberg, “The Dynamics of the Doctoral
Student-Faculty Advising Relationship: A Study Across Academic Disciplines,”
UCLA Doctoral Dissertation Proposal, 11 April 2005.
Revised:
10 November 2010.